According to data collected in early February, agricultural lending activity showed further signs of slowing in the first quarter, despite an increase in the volume of operating loans. The total volume of non-real estate loans remained above the historical average, but were about 10 percent lower than a year ago. Despite a decline in most types of lending, loans for operating expenses increased nearly 10 percent (Chart 1). The overall decline was driven by a drop of about 30 percent in both livestock loans and loans for miscellaneous purposes.
The upward trend in loan size appeared to wane, despite a larger average for operating loans. Since 2010, the average size of farm loans has trended steadily higher, but the pace of the increase has slowed following a sharp rise in late 2018 and early 2019 (Chart 2). Similar to loan volumes, operating loans were about 10 percent larger than a year ago while loans for all other purposes were smaller. However, the average size of all loan types over the past four quarters was below the trend level of growth through the first quarter.
For loans used to finance operating expenses, a relatively high number of large loans contributed to the increase in average size. Despite a decline in the total number of new loans, the share and volume of short-term loans greater than $1 million increased from a year ago (Chart 3). In contrast to operating lines, the volume of larger loans for all other purposes declined slightly. Overall, loans greater than $1 million have become more prevalent in the past decade, and continued to influence changes in overall lending activity.
As lending for non-real estate farm uses slowed slightly from a year ago, interest rates on new farm loans declined alongside lower benchmark interest rates. Similar to the change in the bank prime lending rate through the first week of February, the average effective rate on all non-real estate loans was about 70 basis points less than the previous year (Chart 4). The combination of lower lending volumes and interest rates in the first quarter could reduce overall interest expense for producers.
Section B – Fourth Quarter Call Report Data
Similar to national trends for new loans in the first quarter, total farm debt outstanding grew at a slower pace in the fourth quarter of 2019. Growth in real estate debt remained relatively stable, while non-real estate debt declined slightly (Chart 5)1. Alongside the decline in non-real estate debt, total debt outstanding grew just 0.4 percent from the previous year, which was the slowest rate of growth since 2011.
Although farm debt grew at a slower pace, delinquency rates at commercial banks increased slightly. Adjusting for seasonality, delinquency rates on non-real estate loans reached 2 percent for the first time since 2011, but still were low from a longer-term perspective (Chart 6). The share of nonperforming farm real estate loans also increased modestly. Despite remaining at relatively low levels, delinquencies on agricultural production and farm real estate loans were slightly higher than for other nonagricultural business and real estate loans.
Despite some modest deterioration in loan performance, agricultural banks have maintained strong financial positions. Capital ratios at agricultural banks have increased steadily since the Great Recession and have remained above the industry average (Chart 7). In addition, although capital ratios at highly concentrated agricultural banks have been lower than the industry average historically, they have increased since 2010 and surpassed the average level for all commercial banks in 2019.
Section C – Fourth Quarter Regional Agricultural Data
Alongside slightly higher loan delinquencies nationally, agricultural credit conditions in Federal Reserve Districts remained weak in the fourth quarter, but appeared to stabilize somewhat at the time. For example, compared with previous years, repayment rates on farm loans declined at a slower pace in all Districts except Dallas (Chart 8). In the Chicago, Kansas City and St. Louis Districts, repayment rates declined at the slowest pace in five years.
Some stability in farm income likely contributed to slower deterioration in repayment rates. A majority of bankers in the Kansas City, Minneapolis and St. Louis Districts reported that farm income was lower than last year, but the pace of decline was slower (Chart 9). Although livestock and crop prices remained subdued, District contacts commented that government trade relief payments supported farm finances and helped farm borrowers make loan payments.
Steady farm real estate markets may have supported more stable financial conditions in the farm economy at the end of 2019. Farmland values increased slightly in the Kansas City District, driven by relatively strong growth in Nebraska and western Missouri (Chart 10). Values for farm real estate declined slightly or remained unchanged overall in the Chicago, Dallas and Minneapolis Districts.
Conclusion
Although lending activity remained elevated, the total volume of new loan originations declined in the first quarter of 2020. Contrary to the overall trend, growth in operating loans increased compared with last year. Although it is unclear exactly how events related to the COVID-19 pandemic will affect farm lending moving forward, demand for farm loans may increase as economic disruptions associated with the pandemic could put additional pressure on farm finances. In the midst of substantial declines in prices for key agricultural commodities in March, the outlook for the farm sector and agricultural credit conditions again may be influenced by support from government programs.
